As
the UN declares
the first famine in Africa in three decades, Cambridge University has
a whole section in
its research page profiling food security looking at all aspects of food
security, including the environment.
Whose
fault is famine? What the world failed to learn from 1840s Ireland by
David Nally makes the important point of 'structural violence': a term used
to describe how certain institutional arrangements can render entire
communities vulnerable to famine and at the same time impede alternative
reforms that nurture local resiliencies. For Nally, the current emphasis
on increasing food production through market integration and technological
fixes, ignores the well-established fact that there is enough food to feed the
world’s present population – in fact recent estimates suggest that there is 20
per cent more food than the world needs. The relationship between food supply
and starvation has long been a contentious issue and the Irish Famine is no
exception. Contemporary accounts describe ships carrying relief from England
passing ships sailing out of Ireland with cargos of wheat and beef to be sold
for prices out of reach to the starving population.
“In
the analogous way,” Nally suggests, “Africa, a land synonymous with disease and
starvation, is a major supplier of raw materials including diamonds, gold, oil,
timber, food and biofuels that underpin the affluence of Western societies. The
current focus on food availability and supply effectively masks how resources
are unevenly distributed and consumed.”
“At present,
the problem of ‘food insecurity’ – to adopt the
modern, sanitised term for widespread starvation – is generally conceptualised
as a scientific and technical matter: geneticists and plant scientists will
engineer harvests that produce more efficient, more abundant crops that are
more tolerant of climatic stress, more resistant to attacks by pathogens, and
so on. This, we are told, will be the basis for ending global hunger. While the
physical sciences do have an important role to play, it is wishful thinking to
believe that hunger can be avoided by simply ‘turbocharging’ nature –
that we can, if you like, engineer our way out of scarcity,” he argues.
What
is the future of the world when the solution of distribution of resources
remains unresolved?
No comments:
Post a Comment